Showing posts with label Bush Doctrine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bush Doctrine. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Wednesday, June 09, 2010

THE SENATOR FROM BOEING AND NEOCONS

Neo-Conservatives Lead Charge Against Turkey
By Jim Lobe*


The accusation that all Muslims are in it together and none are trustworthy is exactly what we have come to expect from the imbeciles who warned that the collapsing Soviet Union was on the verge of world conquest or that Iraq was building nukes. Have these crazy elder uncles of Zion ever been right about anything?

Team B

1970s to analyze threats the Soviet Union, approved by then Director of Central Intelligence George H. W. Bush, to counter officials within the CIA. They provided the intellectual foundation for the idea of "the window of vulnerability" and of the massive arms buildup that began toward the end of the Carter administration and accelerated under President Ronald Reagan.[4]


Profile: Henry (“Scoop”) Jackson


Henry (“Scoop”) Jackson was a participant or observer in the following events:



Albert Wohlstetter (see 1965) sends two of his young proteges, Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz, to work on the staff of Senator Henry “Scoop” Jackson (D-WA—see Early 1970s

Committee to Maintain a Prudent Defense Policy, a Cold War think tank co-founded by former Secretary of State Dean Acheson and former Secretary of the Navy Paul Nitze


Richard Perle, fresh out of the London School of Economics, comes to Washington


Sullivan quits before an incensed CIA Director Stansfield Turner can fire him

“the Madison Group”


publisher Irving Kristol

react with horror to the ascendancy of the “McGovern liberals”

Monday, May 31, 2010

BUSH, KIRCHNER, OLIVER STONE AND WAR

Kirchner said he once discussed global economic problems with former President George W. Bush. Bush said "...the best way to revitalize the economy is war. And that the United States has grown stronger with war. All of the economic growth of the United States has been encouraged by wars." He said it very clearly.



Democrats have a much better record at starting wars:
James Polk-Mexican,
Wilson-WWI,
FDR-WWII,
Truman-Korean,
Kennedy/Johnson-Vietnam,
Carter-Afghanistan,
Clinton, Yugoslavia/Rwanda,
Obama-AFPAK.

Republicans:
McKinnley-Spanish American,
Bush I-Gulf I,
Bush II-Afghanistan/Gulf II

That's 8 to 2 in favor of the Dems. And Obama is still in office and Iran looms large and Hillary working hard on N.Korea

Friday, May 28, 2010

BUSH: THE US HAS USED WARS TO GROW THE ECONOMY



President George W. Bush argued in 2004 that the best way to grow the U.S. economy was by waging war, according to former Argentine Prime Minister Néstor Kirchner.

Kirchner, in a meeting with Bush, suggested that the United States replicate the successful nation-building strategy it implemented at the end of World War II.

"And he stood up from his chair and got angry. He told me, 'A Marshall plan! No! That's a crazy idea from the Democrats. What needs to be done here, and the best way to revitalize the economy is -- the United States has grown based on wars,' he told me. That's what he told me," Kirchner recounted.

Bush added, said Kirchner, that "all the economic growth that the U.S. had had, had been based on the different wars it had waged."

The film is co-written by Tariq Ali, a British intellectual, and Mark Weisbrot of the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Economic and Policy Research. The film opens in theaters June 25th.


...except democrats have a much better record at starting wars: James Polk-Mexican, Wilson-WWI, FDR-WWII, Truman-Korean, Kennedy/Johnson-Vietnam, Carter-Afghanistan, Obama-AFPAK. Republicans: McKinnley-Spanish American, Bush I-Gulf I, Bush II-Afghanistan/Gulf II. That's 7 to 2 in favor of the Dems. And Obama is still in office and Iran looms.

Monday, January 04, 2010

THE GREAT GAME 2009

the efforts of Moscow and India to blunt China's soft-power push into Russia's "near beyond" - the oil and gas-rich former Soviet republics
India's opportunistic decision to play the "Great Game" on the cheap - piggybacking the military
and diplomatic presence of Moscow and Washington in selected pro-Russian and pro-Western states in Central Asia to score points off its rivals China and Pakistan
Indian Air Force base in, of all places, Mongolia.
thwarting of India's signature piece of air-base diplomacy - in
Tajikistan
Russia-India strategic partnership looks like a bad marriage
unwittingly reveal their inadequacies.
The joint communique
Beyond irking Beijing and creating an additional counterweight to China
an attempt to gain vitally needed support from a credible, emerging superpower for Moscow's faltering security doctrine.
Russia has been laboring with scant success to leverage its potential utility on Afghanistan
Putin succumbed to
Georgia's
provocations (and the West's
orchestration of the

independence of Kosovo) with overwhelming force in 2008
Russia won the war but no overt backing from ex-Soviet states
attempts to build a culture of dependency on Russian military might and arms sales
India
has endured legendary difficulties
with Moscow
Russia's anxiety has increased exponentially as India enjoys its new strategic partnership - and the potential for arms sales - with the United States instead
Russia struggles with its diplomatic isolation
success
China - the SCO.
formed
resisting both US-sponsored color revolutions
and brutal Islamicist insurgencies
to China's control of its restive Muslim autonomous region of Xinjiang did not take root in the region
the point of the SCO is multi-lateral economic and security integration that creates a profitable, stable, and strategically friendly backyard for China
China has resisted calls to use the SCO as the basis for a military alliance.
shaped by awareness that any military organization would be dominated by the Russians
and attract the

overwhelmingly hostile interest of the US
China is very anxious to keep a lid on things in Central Asia
to the aggrieved Uyghur separatists of Xinjiang
SCO has a
office in Tashkent
combating the "three evils" of terrorism, extremism and separatism
Beijing's vision
to demonstrate the advantages of stable, pro-Chinese regimes
October meeting of SCO
China
reiterated a pledge of $10 billion
ride out the global financial crisis
China's extensive economic penetration of Central Asia is a matter of public record.
bank of the Amu Darya River on December 14
China, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan turned the valves
30 billion cubic meters per annum
to Xinjiang
multi-national project
distinction between promoting regional integration and assembling a geopolitical bloc
Turkmenistan now has a major alternative
to Russia's contentious and overbearing Gazprom
"China's gas supply from Turkmenistan" published on December 28, 2009, by Hurriyet Daily News

The additional bargaining power Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan gained from diversifying their energy export routes, thanks to the Chinese assistance, strengthens their political and economic independence and reinforces regional stability and security and that achievement deserves recognition.

Russia's riposte
to assert the existence of an existential narcotics and Islamicist security crisis in Central Asia
can only be resolved with
Russian military muscle.

Russia has been able to enlist India
firmly committed to the civilization-versus-terror narrative courtesy of its burgeoning partnership with the US
Russia and India share
strategic interests in Afghanistan
that conflicts with China's desire to let the Pashtuns sort things out
eye of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence
Russia hopes to leverage
Afghan
into an acceptance of Moscow's security leadership by Stans vulnerable to
Islamic militancy
India recognizes any victory by pro-Pakistan Pashtun factions
as a defeat for its efforts to distract and bedevil Pakistan.
This shared interest
joint statement of Manmohan and
Medvedev
to preclude negotiating with the Taliban insurgency
the

centerpiece of the US strategy
political settlement and depart
[Russia and India] agree that the fight against terrorism cannot be selective, and drawing false distinctions between 'good' and 'bad' Taliban would be counter-productive."
a meaningful alliance
founder on the collision between Moscow's crude anti-diplomacy and India's ineffectual and opportunistic outreach
neatly illustrated
Tajikistan
The Tajik
disregards the artificial border and dominates northwestern Afghanistan, including the Ferghana Valley, the legendary bulwark of the anti-Pashtun, anti-Taliban Tajik leader and Russian asset, Ahmad Shah Massoud
Russia relied on Tajikistan to provide a logistical rear area for its support of the Northern Alliance during the period of Taliban domination
India pitched in by constructing a military hospital at the town of Farkhor in Tajikistan territory a scant two kilometers from the Afghan border
Massoud
died at the hospital two days before the September 11, 2001 attacks
Tajikistan is the new

hotspot in the global "war on terror" as
the centerpiece of
Petraeus' efforts to support the Afghan surge with a new supply route - the Northern Distribution Network (NDN)
bringing an ocean of cash
Tajikistan security has deteriorated
as militants fleeing the Pakistan government crackdown in Waziristan have found refuge in Tajikistan's vulnerable border regions
the movement of militants to
peaceful northern border districts to attack the NDN
the US and NATO, Russia and India sense opportunity in Tajikistan, giving the local boss, Emomali Rahmon, a chance to play off one
against the other
and reveal the fragility
between Russia and India
India maintained its presence at Farkhor
negotiated terms in 2002 for its first significant military base outside India, at the Ayni airport on the outskirts of Tajikistan's capital of Dushanbe
India's ubiquitous quasi-military Border Roads Organization
increasingly finds itself operating beyond India's borders
went to work expanding Ayni's runway
Stories were floated

India would station helicopters or even MiG fighters at Ayni
Ayni would be operated in rotation by Russia, India and Tajikistan
Indian Air Force would be reliant on Russia's good offices and logistical support to maintain its presence
But what Russia giveth, it taketh away.
Russia has been eyeing India's rapprochement with the US with considerable jealousy and anxiety
also covets Ayni
as a platform for its own aircraft
Russian-backed
CSTO
its importance in the suddenly significant northern Afghan theater
Last September, India
tried to bypass
and play its own bilateral hand in Tajikistan
Tajikistan, responding to some combination of Russian resentment, Chinese objections, and insufficient bribery, decided to evict 150 Indian military
from Ayni
Moscow
telling New Delhi not to "stray" into the American military hardware camp
India annually conducts defense business of over $1.5 billion
Over the next decade
$40 billion to replace or upgrade
predominantly
Russian
equipment
with Russia wanting to renegotiate

its $85 billion Sukhoi 30MkI multi-role fighter deal
In July
Tajik
declared
Dushanbe was not negotiating with New Delhi about permitting India a military base at Ayni
the US
forestall eviction from its airbase at Manas Airport in Kyrgyzstan
hopeless situations can be turned around
combination of concessions to Russia and payoffs to the local potentate
So India might still find a
foothold for its air force
but it will remain beholden to
Russian
has forestalled a genuine strategic partnership between Moscow and New Delhi that will counter the "soft power" outreach of Beijing through the SCO
the December Russia-India communique made no mention of Russia's pet geopolitical projects: the European Security Treaty or the CTSO
As long as India continues to rely on its equivocal relationship as an auxiliary to Russia and
the US in their great power machinations
it is likely that India and Russia will keep spinning their gears as China and the SCO continue to move ahead
Peter Lee

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

715/775 WERE FREED

Since October 7, 2001, when the current war in Afghanistan began, 775 detainees have been brought to Guantánamo. Of these, approximately 420 have been released without charge. In January 2009, approximately 245 detainees remained.[14] This number has further decreased to 215 by November 2009.[12]

Three have been convicted of various charges:

* David Hicks was found guilty under retrospective legislation introduced in 2006 of providing material support to terrorists in 2001.[15][16]
* Salim Hamdan accepted a position on bin Laden's personal staff only as a chauffeur.[17]
* Ali al-Bahlul made a video celebrating the attack on the USS Cole (DDG-67).

Of those still incarcerated, U.S. officials said they intend to eventually put 60 to 80 on trial and free the rest.
The cell in which David Hicks, an Australian Guantánamo Bay prisoner, was detained. Inset is the prisoners' reading room

On September 22, 2004, ten prisoners were brought from Afghanistan.

In July 2005, 242 detainees were moved out of Guantánamo, including 173 that were released without charge, and 69 transferred to the governments of other countries, according to the U.S. Department of Defense.[18]

By November 2005, 358 of the then-505 detainees held at Guantánamo Bay had Administrative Review Board hearings.[19] Of these, 3% were granted and were awaiting release, 20% were to be transferred, 37% were to be further detained at Guantánamo, and no decision had been made in 40% of the cases.

The Center for Constitutional Rights has prepared a biography of some of the prisoners currently being held in Guantánamo Prison.[20]

On February 11, 2008, the US Department of Defense charged Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Ramzi Binalshibh, Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi, Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali and Walid Bin Attash for the September 11 attacks under the military commission system, as established under the Military Commissions Act of 2006.[21]

On February 5, 2009, charges against Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri were dropped without prejudice following an order signed by US President Barack Obama to suspend trials for 120 days.[22] Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri was accused of renting a small boat connected with the USS Cole bombing. He is one of the detainees held at Guantánamo Bay Detention Camp known to have been interrogated with water boarding[citation needed].

Sunday, December 13, 2009

BUSH DOCTRINE

Bush Doctrine
initially
  • described the policy that the United States had the right to secure itself from countries that harbor or give aid to terrorist groups, which was used to justify the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan.[1]

Later

  • policy of preventive war, which held that the United States should depose foreign regimes that represented a potential or perceived threat to the security of the United States, even if that threat was not immediate;

  • a policy of spreading democracy around the world, especially in the Middle East, as a strategy for combating terrorism

  • a willingness to pursue U.S. military interests in a unilateral way