Showing posts with label F William Engdahl. Show all posts
Showing posts with label F William Engdahl. Show all posts

Sunday, February 06, 2011

Jack Blood Interviews F William Engdahl February 1 2011

Egypt – Creative Destruction For A ‘Greater Middle East’? The Promised Land?


By F. William Engdahl
© F. William Engdahl, author Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order *

Fast on the heels of the regime change in Tunisia came a popular-based protest movement launched on January 25 against the entrenched order of Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak. Contrary to the carefully-cultivated impression that the Obama Administration is trying to retain the present regime of Mubarak, Washington in fact is orchestrating the Egyptian as well as other regional regime changes from Syria to Yemen to Jordan and well beyond in a process some refer to as “creative destruction.”

The template for such covert regime change has been developed by the Pentagon, US intelligence agencies and various think-tanks such as RAND Corporation over decades, beginning with the May 1968 destabilization of the de Gaulle presidency in France. This is the first time since the US-backed regime changes in Eastern Europe some two decades back that Washington has initiated simultaneous operations in many countries in a region. It is a strategy born of a certain desperation and one not without significant risk for the Pentagon and for the long-term Wall Street agenda. What the outcome will be for the peoples of the region and for the world is as yet unclear.

Friday, January 28, 2011

Orchestrated Storms: US sending waves through Yemen, Egypt, Tunisia?



[We are about to see just how masterful the masters of the strategy of tension are in their meddling and attempting to turn societies against themselves in order to shape the fiery end-product. I am certain that their egos exceed their mastery of human nature, at least any of the higher aspects of that nature. They will continue playing around, manipulating hot-headed emotions until the whole thing takes on a life of its own.]

http://therearenosunglasses.wordpress.com/2011/01/28/the-entire-arab-world-is-going-over-the-cliff/

Engdahl in the link above mentions Freedom House being one of the puppeteers orchestrating the unrest spreading across muslim nations - this is the same blueprint how the color revolutions were done in the ex-Soviet territory, the former Yugoslavia - same chefs and same recipes used - all the NGOs who are humanitarian fronts for US intel have trained propagandists on the ground leading these efforts are there once again.

Former CIA director neocon James Woolsey was the chairman of Freedom House and trustees include Zbig Brzezinski, former Clinton Commerce Secretary Stuart Eizenstat, and Susan Rice's old partner in crime, NSA adviser Anthony Lake. F

Freedom House lists USAID, US Information Agency, Soros Foundations and the National Endowment for Democracy, among its financial backers.

The serfs in a number of muslim nations are being fooled and directed to tear up their countries so that the NWO may take over and install its puppets, I believe. Look for CIA and Mossad holding some puppet strings.

Saturday, July 10, 2010

LUBMIN, GERMANY: GEOPOLITICAL PIVOT



clipped from: niqnaq.wordpress.com



German Chancellors disappear who deviate from Washington agenda. Schroeder was first in opposition to the 2003 US invasion of Iraq, and second, more serious strategically negotiations with Putin for new gas pipeline bypassing Poland.

Today, Nord Stream has reached Mecklenburg-Vorpommern town of Lubmin, a geopolitical pivot for Europe and Russia. Bill Clinton demanded Schroeder, if elected, support a US-NATO war against Serbia in 1999.

By 2005, Bush turned its attention to a successor. Schroeder's last act was to approve Nord Stream from Vyborg to Lubmin. Upon his defeat, he became chairman of Nord Stream AG, a joint venture between state-owned Gazprom and E.ON-Ruhrgas and BASF-Wintershall. He alsoaccused Georgia of initiating the 2008 war against South Ossetia.

In 2006, Poland’s For. Min. Sikorsk compared Nord Stream to the 1939 Nazi-Soviet Pact. The US has used Poland as a wedge to block Russian-German economic and political cooperation. This month, Nord Stream's first pipeline reached Lubmin. The second string will be completed later this month and begins operation in late 2011. It will be the world’s biggest subsea route through Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Germany, avoiding Poland and the three Baltic States.

From Lubmin it will go through Saxony to the Czech border. From there, Other routes to Holland, France and the UK, France’s GDF Suez bought a 9% share, Holland's Nederlandse Gasunie has 9%. It has broad EU support.

a major geopolitical accomplishment with strong US opposition. Nord long-term agreements is with Denmark, the UK, France, Netherlands and Belgium as well as Germany.

Gazprom is advancing South Stream from Russia under Black Sea to Bulgaria and to Italy. South Stream, bypassing Ukraine. from the Soviet era pipelines transited Ukraine. in Jan 2005 “Orange Revolution” brought pro-NATO regime to power. Recent elections has taken a more neutral stance. The offshore part of South Stream is jointly between Gazprom and Italy’s ENI. From there, pre-existing pipelines through Bulgaria will be used.

Washington is applying major pressure on EU countries and Turkey to build Nabucco. To date, little backing in the EU and insufficient gas to fill it.

Completion of the gas line will result in a major geopolitical bond between EU, Central Europe and Russia and a geopolitical nightmare for the US.

US policy since WW2 has been to dominate, first by fanning the Cold War, and then after 1990 by pushing NATO eastwards towards Europe. Europe turning east has been a major defeat for the “sole Superpower”.

Lubmin is now a major geopolitical pivot

Monday, June 07, 2010

Kyrgyzstan: The training center in Batken is established to respond to Uzbek military threat


«US Assists Kyrgyzstan in Constructing Anti-Terrorist Center in Batken»

headline from Eurasia Daily Monitor, the Jamestown Foundation daily network, motivated by "Uzbek threat". It is not the Americans who want to reach the Ferghana Valley, but Bishkek who asks to strengthen southern borders.

The training center in the Ferghana Valley, the Batken Oblast. this news continues to produce many questions. Eurasia Daily Monitor decided to clarification.

March 10 Petraeus and Bakiyev said the security challenges stem from Afghanistan. However some key military leaders see aggression emerging from Uzbekistan"

Kyrgyz view, Tashkent is developing its military forces and pose a threat to Kyrgyzstan’s water resource and protecting Uzbek living in Osh and Batken

Sunday, June 06, 2010

NDN is the Key


Northern Distribution Network include:Latvia;Azerbaijan;Georgia; Kazakhstan; Russia; Tajikistan; and Uzbekistan. US war bases have been renamed ‘transit centers.’ They are still US military bases. Russia’s role, establishment of the rail line from Latvia down to the Uzbek-Afghan border, also agreeing to over-flights. struggling
Russian companies, it give them tens of millions of sorely-needed dollars. At the However, at the same time Moscow to convince the Bakiev to deny further access to the Manas. Moscow was unsuccessful.

NDN gives Washington increasing lever over troubled economies. Transit agreements
provide new ties and weaken ties to Russia. NDN build an interest lobby within Russia to continue NATO cooperation. Also, potential of the NDN to create a counter pole to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.

Russian alone, $1 billion a year hauling Pentagon supplies

If the US succeeds it will be checkmate’. blocking any combination from opposing Pentagon
  • nations of South America to follow an independent course, dashed
  • China to build a regional economic zone of stability against the collapsing dollar gone.
  • Russia, broken into feuding pieces as tribal and ethnic and religious wars spread across the states
Hence events in Kyrgyzstan are of staggering geopolitical importance.

Saturday, June 05, 2010

A dubious Community Defense Initiative


McChrystal, has also earmarked $1.3 billion to fund local ‘anti-Taliban’ militias in fourteen areas. McChrystal refuses to disclose details to his NATO allies. And who is to say that armed attacks of these US-funded ‘anti-Taliban’ gangs is ‘Taliban’ or ‘anti-Taliban?’

They are dubbed Community Defense Initiative. It is controlled by Special Forces Group, reports directly to McChrystal. other NATO members are kept out of his US arming of local militias.

there is strong opposition within other NATO member states to the idea of arming local militias. McChrystal has outsourced local militia operations to Arif Noorzai, who is widely distrusted. This is an integral part of the Petraeus ‘surge’ strategy.

On May 19, the Pentagon press services said ‘insurgents’ had launched an assault on Baghram. The previous day, suicide bombers attacked a convoy in Kabul. The US military reported that the Taliban claimed credit.

What is not clear is whether the ‘insurgents’ were some of the thousands of freshly-armed locals recruited by Arif Noorzai, loosely-supervised Community Defense Initiative, or Afghanis genuinely resisting US military assaults and atrocities. Also
whether the Taliban claim of masterminding were just political opportunism, a ploy to make them appear stronger

Pentagon uses private contractors in Afghanistan to do what under law the US Armed Forces are prohibited. This is the privatization of warfare. An New York Times article detailed secret and illegal private military contractors under Lockheed Corporation — ‘Strategic Influence Alternatives’ (sic) or ‘American International Security Corporation’ —to carry out operations in eastern Afghan and Pakistan. One such network supervised by CIA veteran Duane “Dewey” Clarridge, ‘counter-terror’ expert in the CIA’s 1980s drug-running Nicaraguan Contras operations

Arming local Afghan militias, deploying private military mercenary companies not bound by Geneva Conventions on warfare or any Afghani laws, comprised of Afghan and Pakistani mercenaries directed by veteran US intelligence officials—this is all a recipe with a colossal potential to spread wars and conflict like a wild brushfire. The record of the US military commands in Iraq, as well as now in Afghanistan, suggests this is in fact their intent—Low Intensity Operations as a method of expanding the war, all under the deceptive umbrella of the NATO ‘Peace Keeping Operation.’

Training the police…


Central to Low Intensity Warfare is the US program to ‘train’ Afghan police. Jeremy Kuzmarov, American historian, has analyzed the US training of domestic police

an essential means where the United States creates a loyal internal security apparatus of client regimes, fortifying their power and repressing the political opposition.

Obama has placed a premium on police training. The stated aim is to provide security to the population so as to enable local forces to gradually take over from the military. A similar strategy in Iraq. In both, implicated in sectarian violence, death squad activity and torture. At the same time, weaponry has found its way to
insurgents, many have infiltrated state security apparatus, contributing to
long-drawn out nature of the war

The police in Afghanistan are operated by ethnic warlords paid by the CIA, routinely do shakedowns at random checkpoints, shooting and killing unarmed demonstrators, stealing local farmers’ land, terrorizing the civilian population and participating in house-to-house raids in US military-assisted sweep operations.

This fits with a larger historical pattern of ethnic antagonisms and social polarizations bred by the United States intervention. It is the mobilization of police for military and political ends. Operation Phoenix is an example

repression is a central weapon of US Low Intensity and it is also in addition to
instrument for exercising state power. repression spread the war and domestic resistance. That spreading serves to justify Obama’s ‘surge.’ It is a self-feeding process of spreading conflict. This has been the US aim since the end of Soviet Union

Low Intensity Warfare and PKO


termed Low Intensity Warfare by the British Army officer, Frank Kitson, who developed
the method for Malaysia, in Kenya during the Mau Mau freedom struggles and in Northern Ireland

‘Low Intensity Warfare’ as Kitson termed it, involves use of deception, of infiltration by double agents, provocateurs, and use of defectors into legitimate popular movements such as those struggling for colonial independence after 1945.

Gang/Counter-Gang. The orchestrating agency controls the actions of both sides, creating small civil wars, creating gang wars, dividing the legitimate movement, thus creating pretext for Peace-Keeping Operations” or PKO.

In his advanced course on American Military Intervention Since Vietnam, Grant Hammond of the US Air War College refers openly to Low Intensity Conflict, aka Peace Keeping Operations as, “war by another name".

Iraq 2003 US invasion. US and British Special Forces covertly armed the insurgents against US-backed regimes in Iraq or Afghan. arming the Taliban same time pouring millions into arming local ‘anti-Taliban’ fighters

This is textbook low-intensity warfare

These Special Forces who are arming ‘insurgents’ include private mercenaries or military contractors such as Blackwater (recently renamed Xe

Spreading War via NDN


To enable the spread of International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) the Northern Distribution Network (NDN) is key. US presence in Kyrgyzstan is a key to the NDN. It involves a series of logistical arrangements connecting Baltic and Caspian ports with Afghanistan. Iran and China are also being considered to open those to Pentagon logistic.


NDN provides a mechanism. It only costs a few millions of dollars of transit fees, to penetrate deep. The flow of war material and troops will be huge. Under the Obama ‘surge’ the demand for non-military supplies in 2010-2011 is estimated to be 200-300% more than in 2008.


Holbrooke toured Central Asia in February. During Kyrgyzstan, Holbrooke intended to conduct a secret meeting with the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) to discuss guerilla sabotage of the Turkmenistan-Uzbekistan-Kyrgyzstan-China (TUKC)


The true geopolitical aim of the US is to sabotage Chinese pipeline under the cover of ‘terrorist’ attacks. This is the classic ‘false flag’


Paul Quinn-Judge, International Crisis Group says stepped-up US military-related shipping through Kyrgyzstan will lead to attacks by insurgent groups Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan and the Islamic Jihad Union.


“The problem with the Northern Distribution Network is obvious. It turns Central Asia into a part of the theater of war,” in March 2009, Obama announced $5.5 million to the Bakiyev administration for a “counter-terrorism“training center. This is the second major military foothold in the country and it is a staging area to spread the war. CIA’s use of Islamic militants as covert foreign policy is a fact.

The same military that ‘trains’ the terrorists also trains the ‘anti-terrorists.’the essence of US and British-developed methods of warfare employed actively since the early 1950s.

Spreading a cancer across Central Asia


The current phase is fomenting various insurgencies across all of Central Asia
With Afghanistan as the core, then to Pakistan and Iran, into Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and ultimately Russia and China via Xinjiang.

tactics include igniting local insurgencies by atrocities and encouraging resistance
or war crimes as official policy.

The strategy is spreading insurgencies and inciting resistance. Then fighting it under the GWOT rubric, a war that can never be “won,” and a pretext for permanent
presence. step-by-step military occupation, a doctrine of Full Spectrum Dominance

Radical jihadist Islam has replaced Soviet Communism. It is ideological deception to trap unwitting Americans to make sacrifices.

Obama Admin starting in January 2009. war has spread into Pakistan with feeble protest from Asif Ali Zardari, “Mr Ten Percent”. US authorities blocked investigation of his activities. Today Washington could blackmail him if he fails to toe the mark. Zardari has been foot draging on Pakistan counter-terror strategy. Promotes the spreading of US-led war via CIA drone strikes on innocent civilians.

This rubric of fighting Taliban terrorists has resulted in the AfPak Theater. It is a linguistic means of creating acceptance. The next phase Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan and Tajikistan around the Ferghana Valley as the pivot

Al Qaeda, U.S. Oil Companies, and Central Asia


Afghan War ended in 1989.
The Najibullah regime fell in April 1992
MEGA Oil 1991
1993, Heidar Aliyev replaced the elected president.
Revolution of Roses, November 2003
January 23, 2005, Orange Revolution
March 2005, "Tulip Revolution


Al Qaeda activities in Central Asia in the 1990s. U.S.-protected movements of al Qaeda terrorists into regions like Afghanistan, Azerbaijan and Kosovo have served the interests of U.S. oil companies. It also provided pretexts or opportunities for a U.S. military commitment and even troops to follow

since the Afghan War ended in 1989. The Najibullah regime fell in April 1992
Tajiks behind Massoud and Pashtuns behind Hekmatyar began to fight.

Arab Afghans were no longer welcome. With pressure from America, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia, the new president Mojaddedi set policy that Arab Afghans should leave. January 1993 Pakistan followed.

some Uzbek and Tajik mujahedin began fleeing north across the Amu Darya. cross-border raids continued. Hekmatyar and Massoud rasupported the Tajik rebels. Ahmed Rashid documents further support for Tajiks from Saudi Arabia and ISI.

These raids into Tajikistan and later Uzbekistan led to destabilization which was an explicit goal of U.S. policy in the Reagan era, to hasten the break-up of the Soviet Union, and gain access to the Caspian Basin. The collapse of the Soviet Union was disastrous Islamic Republics. in 1991, they began to hold talks with Western oil companies and ongoing negotiations between Kazakhstan and Chevron. The first Bush
supported U.S. oil companies dealing into the Caspian region and a pipeline not controlled by Moscow. In the next administration they were escalated to matters of national security by Clinton.

The threat by Islamist rebels persuaded Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan to allow U.S and also Russian bases. The result was to preserve the status quo small elites grow wealthy and corrupt while most citizens suffer a sharp drop in living conditions.

Donald Rumsfeld was sent to Kyrgyzstan March 2005, "Tulip Revolution".

Azerbaijan, Arab Afghan jihadis clearly assisted. 1991, Richard Secord, Heinie Aderholt, and Ed Dearborn, veterans in Laos, and Oliver North's operations with the Contras. They operated under the cover of a oil company, MEGA Oil. MEGA engaged in military training, passed cash and set up an airline after the model of Air America
picking up mujahedin mercenaries in Afghanistan.

Hekmatyar, still allied with bin Laden was recruiting Afghan to fight in Azerbaijan against Armenia and its Russian allies. The heroin flooded from Afghan through Baku into Chechnya

"Over the course of the next two years, [MEGA Oil] procured thousands of dollars worth of weapons and recruited at least two thousand Afghan mercenaries for Azerbaijan - the first mujahedin to fight on the territory of the former Communist Bloc."

1993, Heidar Aliyev replaced the elected president.

Long-term Pentagon Plan for Central Asia


Pentagon activity in Central Asia begun well before the War on Terror. “General Anthony Zinni says mid- and late 1990s

“US policy makers and officials have suggested different avenues of rationalization for the current and future presence.
  • protecting energy resources and pipelines;
  • deterring the resurrection of Islamic fundamentalism in Central Asia;
  • preventing Russian and/or Chinese hegemony;
  • facilitating democratization and market reforms; and
  • using Central Asia as a re-supply depot for possible action in Afghanistan, as preferred rationale for US presence. Moreover,
  • Central Asia was mentioned as a launching pad in the future operations against Iraq and Iran"

Pentagon agenda is a long-term strategy of step-wise occupation and militarization of the entire region.

The instability and anti-Americanism created by US occupation and bombings of innocent civilians across Pakistan and Afghanistan also serves to supply a perfect pretext to expand the US militarization of all Central Asia

turmoil and instability US create is used to justify the military “peace keeping, what today are termed PKOs or Peace Keeping Operations, whether by
  • NATO directly as in Afghanistan or in Kosovo, or by the
  • UN in oil-rich Haiti since 2004, or oil-rich Darfur in Sudan since 2007, or the mineral-rich Democratic Republic of the Congo since 1999.

In April 2009 Petraeus says the US maintains a strong interest in long-term relationships with the Central Asian. “Central Asia constitutes a pivotal location on the Eurasian continent between Russia, China, and South Asia."

It is a major transit route for regiona commerce and it supplies supporting Coalition efforts in Afghanistan"

Central Asia today is at the heart of global strategy for full spectrum dominanace.

George H.W. Bush referred to it as the ‘The New World Order.’

Petraeus adopted the term used by Britain’s Sir Halford Mackinder, the father of Geopolitics, when he described Central Asia as a ‘pivot’ for US interests

Washington’s interest in Kyrgyzstan is comprehensible only when we consider it in the context of this Great Game – the Pentagon’s Eurasian geopolitical strategy to militarize the Pivot Area, or Heartland, as Mackinder later named it.

Wednesday, June 02, 2010

WASHINGTON AND THE KYRGYZ FUTURE - SECURING THE PIVOT


Washington and the Kyrgyz future—Securing the Pivot
by F. William Engdahl*

Long-term Pentagon Plan for Central Asia
Spreading a cancer across Central Asia
Spreading War via NDN
Low Intensity Warfare and PKO
Training the police…
A dubious Community Defense Initiative
NDN is the Key
NDN and Kyrgyzstan’s Batken ‘Anti-Terror’ center
Opium in the Central Asian War
US Military as Opium Exporter?
Conclusion

To this end, the U.S. is employing the time-tested tactics of Low Intensity Warfare to generate the pretext for NATO’s permanent expansion under guise of the ‘war on terror’, with opium gainfully fueling the operations. If successful in Central Asia, Washington will have achieved a ‘checkmate’ by effectively blocking any combination of nations on earth from opposing its agenda of Full Spectrum Dominance.

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 a prime strategic objective of the Pentagon and of US intelligence has been to deeply penetrate the former Soviet states of Central Asia.