Putin Adviser Urges Dumping US Bonds In Reaction to Sanctions

http://en.ria.ru/business/20140304/188081405/Putin-Adviser-Urges-Dumping-US-Bonds-In-Reaction-to-Sanctions.html
MOSCOW, March 4 (RIA Novosti) – An adviser to Russian President Vladimir Putin said Tuesday that authorities would issue general advice to dump US government bonds in the event of Russian companies and individuals being targeted by sanctions over events in Ukraine  

Sergei Glazyev said the United States would be the first to suffer in the event of any sanctions regime.


Full Sanction Program:

 Exchange controls and capital controls.  No more hot money.  You have to get gov permission to send money in or out
You have to protect the ruble against Anglo American attack using above all credit default swaps.  Probably ought to ban CDS immediately

State monopoly on international trade

The threat on defaulting on all money owed to New York and London Banks

Dumping the entire portfolio of US Treasury Securities

The central bank.  Elvira Nabiullina replaced.  Abandon current position of being a satellite of the US Federal Reserve.  Only creates new rubles when they have dollars in the vault.  You have to start issuing your own ruble denominated loans at very low interest rates as close to zero as you can get and that has to be lent for infrastructure, foreign trade financing, mfg, ag, mining, forestry, scientific research,

How Russia Can Respond to the West's Economic War

1. Exchange controls and capital controls.  No more hot money.  Gov permission to send money in or out of country.  Protect the ruble against Anglo American attack who will use credit default swaps.  Ban CDS immediately

2. State monopoly on international trade

3. Default on all money owed to New York and London Banks

4. Dump the entire portfolio of US Treasury Securities

5. The central bank: replace Elvira Nabiullina as head.  Abandon being a satellite of the US Federal Reserve.  Start issuing ruble denominated loans at very low interest rates - zero century - to be lent for infrastructure, foreign trade financing, mfg, ag, mining, forestry, scientific research

6. Put Sergei Glazyev in charge.


 1.  Increase its domestic investments
2.  Increase its investment in China , S.America and the Silk Road
3.  More military aid to Syria, Iraq, Iran
4.  Eliminate Saudis/US Terrorism
5.  Create a new oil syndicate: Russia, Brasil, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Venezuela, Azerbaijan, China


Putin's Move

1. Put Sergei Glazyev in charge of the following

2. Exchange controls and capital controls.  Govt permission to send money in or out of country.  Protect the ruble against Anglo American attack.  Ban credit default swaps

3. State monopoly on international trade

4. Default on all money owed to New York and London Banks

5. Dump the portfolio of US Treasury Securities

6. The Russian Central Bank: replace Elvira Nabiullina as head.  Abandon being a satellite of the US FED.  Start issuing low interest ruble denominated loans to be lent for infrastructure, foreign trade financing, mfg, ag, mining, forestry, scientific research

http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2012/06/11/webster-tarpley-on-the-american-system/

http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2012/06/11/webster-tarpley-on-the-american-system/

Webster Tarpley on the American System

Posted on June 11, 2012 by willyloman

by Scott Creighton
Tarpley aptly explains to Alex Jones how Ron Paul’s Austrian libertarianism is nothing more than a repackaging of the neo-liberal Milton Friedman Chicago School of Economics neo-fuadalism. This is what I have been saying for years. Glad to hear Tarpley getting airtime explaining this to Jones. AJ starts off by trying to re-write history pretending that he wasn’t still pushing Ron Paul for president over the last few months when it was clear he couldn’t win. The reason he does that is because he knows and has said that the “Good Doctor” was simply locking his base into a box that was going nowhere so they wouldn’t have an effect on the election. I guess AJ doesn’t want his dwindling viewership to understand he was doing the exact same thing and that RP wouldn’t have been so successful at it if people like AJ and Kokesh weren’t working with him.
It’s a good interview at least at the beginning when Tarpley explains the history of what is called the American System of economics. An outstanding system which created the first majority middle class in human history and made the United States the envy of the rest of the industrialized world. But it also created a pure hatred in the hearts and minds of the oligarchs who knew there were massive profits to be made if only they could convince the people that the extremely efficient and effective system they had was wrong for them and accept a neo-feudal system in it’s place.
It’s hard to watch Jones these days because he is such a ridiculous tool. But, watch it for Tarpley’s explanation of the American System. It’s not “socialism” or “communism”… its ours and it works. Look around you. You have the beginnings of the libertarian/neo-liberal system developing right now. Like it? Look like fascism? There’s a reason for that. Because it IS fascism.

Who have been the victims of "executive assassination" in America? Without exception, the guns of Wall Street have been aimed at the chief exponents of what is called "The American System of Political Economy."

The American System is not Keynesianism or socialism; not libertarianism or anarchism; but the system combining a national bank, a protective tariff, restraints on financial speculators and support for manufacturing, agriculture and the general welfare. Among the martyrs of this system are:

Alexander Hamilton: The architect of America's first national bank, monetary, infrastructure and industrial policies. Hamilton was murdered in a duel by Aaron Burr, the founder of what is now JP Morgan Chase Bank. Burr tried to sell the Louisiana territory to the British, and later advised the presidency of Andrew Jackson.

Abraham Lincoln: The "great emancipator" was also the founder of America's rail and steel industries, its land grant Universities, the Homestead Act, enactor of its highest protective tariff, all in 4 years. Assassin John Wilkes Booth has been linked to a wide-ranging conspiracy in the service of London banks.

James Garfield, William McKinley and Warren Harding: These 3 Lincoln Republicans were all champions of high protective tariffs and opponents of British imperialism. Garfield and McKinley were shot by "lone nuts" and Harding, also a target of the Teapot Dome scandal, is suspected to have been poisoned.

Franklin D. Roosevelt: The enemy of Wall Street, fascism and colonialism, and champion of American working man, FDR was America's longest-serving president for good reason. He survived several early assassination attempts, including the one that felled Chicago mayor Anton Cermak. Though his death is assumed to have been due to a stroke, Josef Stalin confided in FDR's son Elliot that his father had been poisoned by "The Churchill Gang."

John F. Kennedy: Kennedy's "moon shot" mentality, his caution on the Vietnam war and firing of his warmonger cabinet, his hostility to Wall Street interests and cartels, and his introduction of US Treasury money (1964 silver quarters) were among the reasons he became intolerable to Wall Street and London.

If you believe the myth of "lone nuts," you owe yourself a listen to JFK's haunting "Secret Societies" speech: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnEZ6FdE9mE

 

---------------------------------------------------------------

 

 
The Tariff Democrats were in favor of was rather high as well, a 25% effective tariff. Also Harding and Coolidge slashed income taxes drastically for the top 2% of the country, this is not exactly an Administration that should be thought highly of. That McKinley is underappreciated, of that there is little doubt. Also the silver dollars conspiracy is not a solid theory. In Modern Monetary economics inflation has remained quite low. Metallism is no basis, we now know, for a monetary system, only the national economy itself is.

Like · Reply · 1 · February 20 at 5:00pm

• 

  United Front Against Austerity (UFAA) I agree with your last point. Garfield and McKinley were in favor of bimetallism (currency backed by silver and gold), which was at least an improvement over gold-backed currency, as silver was easier to obtain, and would allow for modest inflation so borrowers could pay their debts more easily (see WJ Bryan's Cross of Gold speech). They all would have been better off with a national bank, as the founders had intended. But it's not so easy to do when you get shot dead a couple months or years into your term.
  
  We can't always apply our viewpoints to historical events. Here's background on the Kennedy silver coinage issue: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_11110 - I suspect Kennedy's intentions were similar to those of the bimetallists; to keep control of the US silver supply, and to exert some control over the Fed. Of the above list, Hamilton, Lincoln and FDR showed how it's done, though even their methods could be improved by a purely fiat money based on federal lending for productive investments.

  

  Executive Order 11110 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  en.wikipedia.org

  This executive order delegated to the Secretary of the Treasury the president's ...See More

  Like · February 20 at 5:11pm
• 

  United Front Against Austerity (UFAA) Also, who are these tariff Democrats you speak of? Wilson – who lowered rates by 15%? FDR was the first decent Democratic president, and by that time, the Democrats had basically inherited the old Republican policies.

  Like · February 20 at 5:23pm
• 

  Alexander Grable The Tariff http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenue_Act_of_1913 from the Revenue Act is estimated to have put the effective dutiable as high as 26% lower than it was to be sure, but still plenty high. In any case at that time America was the foremost industrial power trading with countries like France, Britain and Germany which were comparable in living standards to the United States.

  

  Revenue Act of 1913 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  en.wikipedia.org

  The United States Revenue Act of 1913 also known as the Tariff Act, Underwood Ta...See More

  Like · February 20 at 5:28pm
• 

  Alexander Grable A far better thing for this page to focus on would be, in my view, the excessive demonization of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff. Did it worsen the Depression? Yes. Was it a huge factor? No. The issue was falling income and deflation not tariffs.

  Like · February 20 at 5:29pm
• 

  United Front Against Austerity (UFAA) There are actually good arguments based on production statistics that Smoot-Hawley reduced the severity of the depression. I don't think it will be of much interest to this page, but it's certainly a useful argument to have against libertarians who have just enough brain power to memorize the words "Smoot-Hawley".

   

  --------------------------------------------------------------------

   

   
  for one read his speech to be referring to communism, yes. That doesn't mean the same cautions can't be applied to nasty people and groups today. Do you see it differently, H. K.?

  Like · Reply · February 21 at 3:59pm

  • 

    United Front Against Austerity (UFAA) While this was a minor detail of the post, and not something worth dwelling on, I would have to give JFK more credit for being able to perceive greater threats to America than communism. He says,
    
    "[T]here is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand it's meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment."
    
    Why would he be pleading with the press to help him warn anyone about communism? This is 7 years after the McCarthy hearings, it's not an unknown or taboo subject, and "communists" don't have the ability to censor and conceal American policy. When you hear him describe a "ruthless, monolithic conspiracy," keep in mind he's already being warned by General MacArthur about the Wall Street agents in his own cabinet.

     

    ------------------------------------------------------------------

     

     
    Two of these presidents--Lincoln and Kennedy--wanted to abolish the Federal Reserve banking system and an interest-based monetary system, and the bankers couldn't stand for that, so POW POW POW.

    Like · Reply · February 21 at 3:50pm

    

    United Front Against Austerity (UFAA) Don't forget about Hamilton (albeit not a president)! We did a post some weeks ago about the context of the Burr/Hamilton duel, where Burr established the Manhattan company specifically to undermine Hamilton's national bank. Hamilton dragged Burr's dirty deeds out into public view, a public pissing match ensued, and the rest is history!

War of the League of Cambrai

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_the_League_of_Cambrai

Pope Julius II, intending to curb Venetian influence in northern Italy, had created the League of Cambrai, an anti-Venetian alliance that included, besides himself, Louis XII of France, Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian I and Ferdinand II of Aragon. Although the League was initially successful, friction between Julius and Louis caused it to collapse by 1510; Julius then allied himself with Venice against France.

 http://tarpley.net/online-books/against-oligarchy/the-war-of-the-league-of-cambrai-paolo-sarpi-and-john-locke/

http://www.schillerinstitute.org/fid_91-96/952_venice.html

How to identify CIA limited hangout op?

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/06/18/309609/how-to-identify-cia-limited-hangout-op/

The operations of secret intelligence agencies aiming at the manipulation of public opinion generally involve a combination of cynical deception with the pathetic gullibility of the targeted populations.

There is ample reason to believe that the case of Edward Joseph Snowden fits into this pattern.

THE VENETIAN CONSPIRACY

http://www.abjpress.com/tarpv1.html

As the following story details, Venice was at the center of the efforts to destroy the advanced European civilization of the eleventh and twelfth centuries, and bears a crushing burden of guilt for the ascendancy of the Black Guelphs and the coming of the black plague. The Venetians were the intelligencers for the Mongol army of Ghengis Khan and his heirs, and had a hand in guiding them to the sack of Baghdad and the obliteration of its renaissance in the thirteenth century.

http://tarpley.net/online-books/against-oligarchy/the-venetian-conspiracy/

Venice’s War Against
Western Civilization
http://www.schillerinstitute.org/fid_91-96/952_venice.html 

 The Committee of 300: A Brief History of World Power...

Venetian  Black Nobility,

Roots of Today's Ruling Oligarchy

http://investigate911.org/Oligarchy.htm

Venetian Black Nobility, Rulers of the World
http://rafken.hubpages.com/hub/Venetian-Black-Nobility-Rulers-of-the-World